Job:
#OCPBUGS-20479issue2 weeks agoIgnore pod sandbox creation failures due to networking when the node is NetworkUnavailable=true MODIFIED
Issue 15554882: Ignore pod sandbox creation failures due to networking when the node is NetworkUnavailable=true
Description: The test:
 
 [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
 
 Failed a couple payloads today with 1-2 failures in batches of 10 aggregated jobs. [I looked at the most recent errors|https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/tests/4.15/analysis?test=%5Bsig-network%5D%20pods%20should%20successfully%20create%20sandboxes%20by%20adding%20pod%20to%20network&filters=%7B%22items%22%3A%5B%7B%22columnField%22%3A%22name%22%2C%22operatorValue%22%3A%22equals%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22%5Bsig-network%5D%20pods%20should%20successfully%20create%20sandboxes%20by%20adding%20pod%20to%20network%22%7D%2C%7B%22columnField%22%3A%22variants%22%2C%22not%22%3Atrue%2C%22operatorValue%22%3A%22contains%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22never-stable%22%7D%2C%7B%22columnField%22%3A%22variants%22%2C%22not%22%3Atrue%2C%22operatorValue%22%3A%22contains%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22aggregated%22%7D%5D%2C%22linkOperator%22%3A%22and%22%7D] and they seem to often be the same:
 {code:java}
 1 failures to create the sandbox
 
 ns/openshift-monitoring pod/prometheus-k8s-1 node/ip-10-0-24-217.us-west-1.compute.internal - 475.52 seconds after deletion - reason/FailedCreatePodSandBox Failed to create pod sandbox: rpc error: code = Unknown desc = failed to create pod network sandbox k8s_prometheus-k8s-1_openshift-monitoring_c712fc61-5a1e-4cec-b6fa-18c8f2e91c0a_0(46df8384ffeb433fc0e4864262aa52f2ede570265c43bf8b0900f184b27b10f1): error adding pod openshift-monitoring_prometheus-k8s-1 to CNI network "multus-cni-network": plugin type="multus-shim" name="multus-cni-network" failed (add): CmdAdd (shim): failed to send CNI request: Post "http://dummy/cni": EOF
 {code}
 This [http://dummy/cni] URL looked interesting and seemed worthy of a bug.
 
 The problem is a rare failure overall, but happening quite frequently day to day, search.ci indicates lots of hits over the last two days in both 4.14 and 4.15, and seemingly ovn and sdn both:
 
 [https://search.ci.openshift.org/?search=Post+%22http%3A%2F%2Fdummy%2Fcni%22%3A+EOF&maxAge=48h&context=1&type=bug%2Bissue%2Bjunit&name=&excludeName=&maxMatches=5&maxBytes=20971520&groupBy=job]
 
 Some of these will show as flakes as the test gets retried at times and then passes.
 
 Additionally in 4.14 we are seeing similar failures reporting
 {code:none}
 No CNI configuration file in /etc/kubernetes/cni/net.d/. Has your network provider started?{code}
 [4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-10-12-015817|https://amd64.ocp.releases.ci.openshift.org/releasestream/4.14.0-0.nightly/release/4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-10-12-015817] show pod sandbox errors for [azure|https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/tests/4.14/analysis?filters=%257B%2522items%2522%253A%255B%257B%2522columnField%2522%253A%2522name%2522%252C%2522operatorValue%2522%253A%2522equals%2522%252C%2522value%2522%253A%2522%255Bsig-network%255D%2520pods%2520should%2520successfully%2520create%2520sandboxes%2520by%2520other%2522%257D%252C%257B%2522columnField%2522%253A%2522variants%2522%252C%2522not%2522%253Atrue%252C%2522operatorValue%2522%253A%2522contains%2522%252C%2522value%2522%253A%2522never-stable%2522%257D%252C%257B%2522columnField%2522%253A%2522variants%2522%252C%2522not%2522%253Atrue%252C%2522operatorValue%2522%253A%2522contains%2522%252C%2522value%2522%253A%2522aggregated%2522%257D%252C%257B%2522columnField%2522%253A%2522variants%2522%252C%2522operatorValue%2522%253A%2522contains%2522%252C%2522value%2522%253A%2522azure%2522%257D%255D%252C%2522linkOperator%2522%253A%2522and%2522%257D&test=%5Bsig-network%5D%20pods%20should%20successfully%20create%20sandboxes%20by%20other]  &  [aws|https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/tests/4.14/analysis?filters=%257B%2522items%2522%253A%255B%257B%2522columnField%2522%253A%2522name%2522%252C%2522operatorValue%2522%253A%2522equals%2522%252C%2522value%2522%253A%2522%255Bsig-network%255D%2520pods%2520should%2520successfully%2520create%2520sandboxes%2520by%2520other%2522%257D%252C%257B%2522columnField%2522%253A%2522variants%2522%252C%2522not%2522%253Atrue%252C%2522operatorValue%2522%253A%2522contains%2522%252C%2522value%2522%253A%2522never-stable%2522%257D%252C%257B%2522columnField%2522%253A%2522variants%2522%252C%2522not%2522%253Atrue%252C%2522operatorValue%2522%253A%2522contains%2522%252C%2522value%2522%253A%2522aggregated%2522%257D%252C%257B%2522columnField%2522%253A%2522variants%2522%252C%2522operatorValue%2522%253A%2522contains%2522%252C%2522value%2522%253A%2522aws%2522%257D%255D%252C%2522linkOperator%2522%253A%2522and%2522%257D&test=%5Bsig-network%5D%20pods%20should%20successfully%20create%20sandboxes%20by%20other]  both show a drop from the 10th which comes after our force accept
 
 [4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-10-11-141212|https://amd64.ocp.releases.ci.openshift.org/releasestream/4.14.0-0.nightly/release/4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-10-11-141212]  had a host of failures but it is what killed [aws sdn|https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/aggregated-aws-sdn-upgrade-4.14-micro-release-openshift-release-analysis-aggregator/1712109617682583552]
 
 [4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-10-11-200059|https://amd64.ocp.releases.ci.openshift.org/releasestream/4.14.0-0.nightly/release/4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-10-11-200059] [aws sdn|https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/aggregated-aws-sdn-upgrade-4.14-micro-release-openshift-release-analysis-aggregator/1712197385490272256]  as well and shows in [azure|https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/aggregated-azure-ovn-upgrade-4.14-micro-release-openshift-release-analysis-aggregator/1712197406507929600]
Status: MODIFIED
#OCPBUGS-48160issue37 hours agoFailed to create the sandbox-plugin type="multus-shim" name="multus-cni-network" failed (add): CmdAdd (shim): failed to send CNI request: Post "http://dummy/cni": EOF [Openshift-4.14] Verified
Issue 16573555: Failed to create the sandbox-plugin type="multus-shim" name="multus-cni-network" failed (add): CmdAdd (shim): failed to send CNI request: Post "http://dummy/cni": EOF [Openshift-4.14]
Description: Description of problem:{code:none}
 In the 4.14 z-stream rollback job, I'm seeing test-case "[sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network " fail. 
 
 The job link is here https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.14-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-rollback-oldest-supported/1719037590788640768
 
 The error is:
 
 56 failures to create the sandbox
 
 ns/openshift-monitoring pod/prometheus-k8s-1 node/ip-10-0-48-75.us-east-2.compute.internal - 3314.57 seconds after deletion - reason/FailedCreatePodSandBox Failed to create pod sandbox: rpc error: code = Unknown desc = failed to create pod network sandbox k8s_prometheus-k8s-1_openshift-monitoring_95d1a457-3e1b-4ae3-8b57-8023eec5937d_0(5b36bc12b2964e85bcdbe60b275d6a12ea68cb18b81f16622a6cb686270c4eb3): error adding pod openshift-monitoring_prometheus-k8s-1 to CNI network "multus-cni-network": plugin type="multus-shim" name="multus-cni-network" failed (add): CmdAdd (shim): failed to send CNI request: Post "http://dummy/cni": EOF
 ns/openshift-monitoring pod/prometheus-k8s-1 node/ip-10-0-48-75.us-east-2.compute.internal - 3321.57 seconds after deletion - reason/FailedCreatePodSandBox Failed to create pod sandbox: rpc error: code = Unknown desc = failed to create pod network sandbox k8s_prometheus-k8s-1_openshift-monitoring_95d1a457-3e1b-4ae3-8b57-8023eec5937d_0(3cc0afc5bec362566e4c3bdaf822209377102c2e39aaa8ef5d99b0f4ba795aaf): error adding pod openshift-monitoring_prometheus-k8s-1 to CNI network "multus-cni-network": plugin type="multus-shim" name="multus-cni-network" failed (add): CmdAdd (shim): failed to send CNI request: Post "http://dummy/cni": dial unix /run/multus/socket/multus.sock: connect: connection refused
 
 
 {code}
 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):{code:none}
 4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-10-30-170011
 {code}
 How reproducible:{code:none}
 Flaky
 {code}
 Steps to Reproduce:{code:none}
 1.
 2.
 3.
 {code}
 Actual results:{code:none}
 
 {code}
 Expected results:{code:none}
 
 {code}
 Additional info:{code:none}
 The rollback test is testing by installing 4.14.0, then upgrade to the latest 4.14.nightly, at some random point, rolling back to 4.14.0
 {code}
Status: Verified
#OCPBUGS-57926issue9 days ago"[sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network" fails often on compact CI jobs New
Issue 17081653: "[sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network" fails often on compact CI jobs
Description: This conformance test has been failing regularly in our CI:
 
 4.18 example: [https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.18-e2e-agent-compact-fips/1936031560633421824]
 
 4.17 example: [https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.17-e2e-agent-compact-fips/1934953258862776320]
#OCPBUGS-57523issue2 weeks agoComponent Readiness: pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network: expected pod UID "aa853924-c6c6-45b7-be56-e059960bc3c6" but got "ab26e0dc-d736-4945-aa02-91fa3f066cdc" from Kube API New
Issue 17069730: Component Readiness: pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network: expected pod UID "aa853924-c6c6-45b7-be56-e059960bc3c6" but got "ab26e0dc-d736-4945-aa02-91fa3f066cdc" from Kube API
Description: (_Feel free to update this bug's summary to be more specific._)
 Component Readiness has found a potential regression in the following test:
 
 {code:none}[sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network{code}
 
 Significant regression detected.
 Fishers Exact probability of a regression: 100.00%.
 Test pass rate dropped from 99.42% to 93.99%.
 
 Sample (being evaluated) Release: 4.19
 Start Time: 2025-06-10T00:00:00Z
 End Time: 2025-06-17T12:00:00Z
 Success Rate: 93.99%
 Successes: 212
 Failures: 14
 Flakes: 7
 
 Base (historical) Release: 4.17
 Start Time: 2024-09-01T00:00:00Z
 End Time: 2024-10-01T00:00:00Z
 Success Rate: 99.42%
 Successes: 803
 Failures: 5
 Flakes: 54
 
 View the [test details report|https://sippy-auth.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/component_readiness/test_details?Architecture=amd64&FeatureSet=default&Installer=ipi&Network=ovn&Platform=azure&Suite=unknown&Topology=ha&Upgrade=minor&baseEndTime=2025-02-25%2023%3A59%3A59&baseRelease=4.18&baseStartTime=2025-01-26%2000%3A00%3A00&capability=Other&columnGroupBy=Architecture%2CNetwork%2CPlatform%2CTopology&component=Networking%20%2F%20cluster-network-operator&confidence=95&dbGroupBy=Platform%2CArchitecture%2CNetwork%2CTopology%2CFeatureSet%2CUpgrade%2CSuite%2CInstaller&environment=Architecture%3Aamd64%20FeatureSet%3Adefault%20Installer%3Aipi%20Network%3Aovn%20Platform%3Aazure%20Suite%3Aunknown%20Topology%3Aha%20Upgrade%3Aminor&flakeAsFailure=false&ignoreDisruption=true&ignoreMissing=false&includeMultiReleaseAnalysis=true&includeVariant=Architecture%3Aamd64&includeVariant=CGroupMode%3Av2&includeVariant=ContainerRuntime%3Acrun&includeVariant=ContainerRuntime%3Arunc&includeVariant=FeatureSet%3Adefault&includeVariant=FeatureSet%3Atechpreview&includeVariant=Installer%3Aipi&includeVariant=Installer%3Aupi&includeVariant=JobTier%3Ablocking&includeVariant=JobTier%3Ainforming&includeVariant=JobTier%3Astandard&includeVariant=LayeredProduct%3Anone&includeVariant=Network%3Aovn&includeVariant=Owner%3Aeng&includeVariant=Owner%3Aservice-delivery&includeVariant=Platform%3Aaws&includeVariant=Platform%3Aazure&includeVariant=Platform%3Agcp&includeVariant=Platform%3Ametal&includeVariant=Platform%3Arosa&includeVariant=Platform%3Avsphere&includeVariant=Topology%3Aha&includeVariant=Topology%3Amicroshift&minFail=3&passRateAllTests=0&passRateNewTests=95&pity=5&sampleEndTime=2025-06-17%2023%3A59%3A59&sampleRelease=4.19&sampleStartTime=2025-06-10%2000%3A00%3A00&testBasisRelease=4.17&testId=openshift-tests-upgrade%3A65e48733eb0b6115134b2b8c6a365f16&testName=%5Bsig-network%5D%20pods%20should%20successfully%20create%20sandboxes%20by%20adding%20pod%20to%20network] for additional context.
 
 Pretty clearly failing worse in the last week than 4.17 and 4.18 both.
Status: New
periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.14-upgrade-from-stable-4.13-e2e-azure-sdn-upgrade (all) - 18 runs, 28% failed, 440% of failures match = 122% impact
#1940655614887727104junit16 hours ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
6 failures to create the sandbox
#1940655614887727104junit16 hours ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
6 failures to create the sandbox
#1940723675653214208junit12 hours ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
6 failures to create the sandbox
#1940723675653214208junit12 hours ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
6 failures to create the sandbox
#1940367533336956928junit35 hours ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
1 failures to create the sandbox
#1940367533336956928junit35 hours ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
1 failures to create the sandbox
#1940216034489274368junit46 hours ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
10 failures to create the sandbox
#1940216034489274368junit46 hours ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
10 failures to create the sandbox
#1940025329015853056junit2 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
6 failures to create the sandbox
#1940025329015853056junit2 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
6 failures to create the sandbox
#1938528367527596032junit6 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
4 failures to create the sandbox
#1938528367527596032junit6 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
4 failures to create the sandbox
#1940123797168328704junit2 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
8 failures to create the sandbox
#1940123797168328704junit2 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
8 failures to create the sandbox
#1938248688467972096junit7 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
6 failures to create the sandbox
#1938248688467972096junit7 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
6 failures to create the sandbox
#1937894452882313216junit8 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
4 failures to create the sandbox
#1937894452882313216junit8 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
4 failures to create the sandbox
#1938157349457891328junit7 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
11 failures to create the sandbox
#1938157349457891328junit7 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
11 failures to create the sandbox
#1937549607609307136junit9 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
5 failures to create the sandbox
#1937549607609307136junit9 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
5 failures to create the sandbox
#1937987029933494272junit8 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
5 failures to create the sandbox
#1937987029933494272junit8 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
5 failures to create the sandbox
#1937498383153369088junit9 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
5 failures to create the sandbox
#1937498383153369088junit9 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
5 failures to create the sandbox
#1937438458465226752junit9 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
2 failures to create the sandbox
#1937438458465226752junit9 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
2 failures to create the sandbox
#1937186427599065088junit10 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
5 failures to create the sandbox
#1937186427599065088junit10 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
5 failures to create the sandbox
#1937128867676295168junit10 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
10 failures to create the sandbox
#1937128867676295168junit10 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
10 failures to create the sandbox
#1936765289236533248junit11 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
6 failures to create the sandbox
#1936765289236533248junit11 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
6 failures to create the sandbox
#1936695951808794624junit11 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
1 failures to create the sandbox
#1936695951808794624junit11 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
1 failures to create the sandbox
#1936220331152773120junit12 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
7 failures to create the sandbox
#1936220331152773120junit12 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
7 failures to create the sandbox
#1936075903675142144junit13 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
5 failures to create the sandbox
#1936075903675142144junit13 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
5 failures to create the sandbox
#1936006384592097280junit13 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
6 failures to create the sandbox
#1936006384592097280junit13 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
6 failures to create the sandbox
#1935860845552603136junit13 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
6 failures to create the sandbox
#1935860845552603136junit13 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
6 failures to create the sandbox

Found in 122.22% of runs (440.00% of failures) across 18 total runs and 1 jobs (27.78% failed) in 107ms - clear search | chart view - source code located on github