Job:
#OCPBUGS-20479issue2 weeks agoIgnore pod sandbox creation failures due to networking when the node is NetworkUnavailable=true MODIFIED
Issue 15554882: Ignore pod sandbox creation failures due to networking when the node is NetworkUnavailable=true
Description: The test:
 
 [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
 
 Failed a couple payloads today with 1-2 failures in batches of 10 aggregated jobs. [I looked at the most recent errors|https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/tests/4.15/analysis?test=%5Bsig-network%5D%20pods%20should%20successfully%20create%20sandboxes%20by%20adding%20pod%20to%20network&filters=%7B%22items%22%3A%5B%7B%22columnField%22%3A%22name%22%2C%22operatorValue%22%3A%22equals%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22%5Bsig-network%5D%20pods%20should%20successfully%20create%20sandboxes%20by%20adding%20pod%20to%20network%22%7D%2C%7B%22columnField%22%3A%22variants%22%2C%22not%22%3Atrue%2C%22operatorValue%22%3A%22contains%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22never-stable%22%7D%2C%7B%22columnField%22%3A%22variants%22%2C%22not%22%3Atrue%2C%22operatorValue%22%3A%22contains%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22aggregated%22%7D%5D%2C%22linkOperator%22%3A%22and%22%7D] and they seem to often be the same:
 {code:java}
 1 failures to create the sandbox
 
 ns/openshift-monitoring pod/prometheus-k8s-1 node/ip-10-0-24-217.us-west-1.compute.internal - 475.52 seconds after deletion - reason/FailedCreatePodSandBox Failed to create pod sandbox: rpc error: code = Unknown desc = failed to create pod network sandbox k8s_prometheus-k8s-1_openshift-monitoring_c712fc61-5a1e-4cec-b6fa-18c8f2e91c0a_0(46df8384ffeb433fc0e4864262aa52f2ede570265c43bf8b0900f184b27b10f1): error adding pod openshift-monitoring_prometheus-k8s-1 to CNI network "multus-cni-network": plugin type="multus-shim" name="multus-cni-network" failed (add): CmdAdd (shim): failed to send CNI request: Post "http://dummy/cni": EOF
 {code}
 This [http://dummy/cni] URL looked interesting and seemed worthy of a bug.
 
 The problem is a rare failure overall, but happening quite frequently day to day, search.ci indicates lots of hits over the last two days in both 4.14 and 4.15, and seemingly ovn and sdn both:
 
 [https://search.ci.openshift.org/?search=Post+%22http%3A%2F%2Fdummy%2Fcni%22%3A+EOF&maxAge=48h&context=1&type=bug%2Bissue%2Bjunit&name=&excludeName=&maxMatches=5&maxBytes=20971520&groupBy=job]
 
 Some of these will show as flakes as the test gets retried at times and then passes.
 
 Additionally in 4.14 we are seeing similar failures reporting
 {code:none}
 No CNI configuration file in /etc/kubernetes/cni/net.d/. Has your network provider started?{code}
 [4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-10-12-015817|https://amd64.ocp.releases.ci.openshift.org/releasestream/4.14.0-0.nightly/release/4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-10-12-015817] show pod sandbox errors for [azure|https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/tests/4.14/analysis?filters=%257B%2522items%2522%253A%255B%257B%2522columnField%2522%253A%2522name%2522%252C%2522operatorValue%2522%253A%2522equals%2522%252C%2522value%2522%253A%2522%255Bsig-network%255D%2520pods%2520should%2520successfully%2520create%2520sandboxes%2520by%2520other%2522%257D%252C%257B%2522columnField%2522%253A%2522variants%2522%252C%2522not%2522%253Atrue%252C%2522operatorValue%2522%253A%2522contains%2522%252C%2522value%2522%253A%2522never-stable%2522%257D%252C%257B%2522columnField%2522%253A%2522variants%2522%252C%2522not%2522%253Atrue%252C%2522operatorValue%2522%253A%2522contains%2522%252C%2522value%2522%253A%2522aggregated%2522%257D%252C%257B%2522columnField%2522%253A%2522variants%2522%252C%2522operatorValue%2522%253A%2522contains%2522%252C%2522value%2522%253A%2522azure%2522%257D%255D%252C%2522linkOperator%2522%253A%2522and%2522%257D&test=%5Bsig-network%5D%20pods%20should%20successfully%20create%20sandboxes%20by%20other]  &  [aws|https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/tests/4.14/analysis?filters=%257B%2522items%2522%253A%255B%257B%2522columnField%2522%253A%2522name%2522%252C%2522operatorValue%2522%253A%2522equals%2522%252C%2522value%2522%253A%2522%255Bsig-network%255D%2520pods%2520should%2520successfully%2520create%2520sandboxes%2520by%2520other%2522%257D%252C%257B%2522columnField%2522%253A%2522variants%2522%252C%2522not%2522%253Atrue%252C%2522operatorValue%2522%253A%2522contains%2522%252C%2522value%2522%253A%2522never-stable%2522%257D%252C%257B%2522columnField%2522%253A%2522variants%2522%252C%2522not%2522%253Atrue%252C%2522operatorValue%2522%253A%2522contains%2522%252C%2522value%2522%253A%2522aggregated%2522%257D%252C%257B%2522columnField%2522%253A%2522variants%2522%252C%2522operatorValue%2522%253A%2522contains%2522%252C%2522value%2522%253A%2522aws%2522%257D%255D%252C%2522linkOperator%2522%253A%2522and%2522%257D&test=%5Bsig-network%5D%20pods%20should%20successfully%20create%20sandboxes%20by%20other]  both show a drop from the 10th which comes after our force accept
 
 [4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-10-11-141212|https://amd64.ocp.releases.ci.openshift.org/releasestream/4.14.0-0.nightly/release/4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-10-11-141212]  had a host of failures but it is what killed [aws sdn|https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/aggregated-aws-sdn-upgrade-4.14-micro-release-openshift-release-analysis-aggregator/1712109617682583552]
 
 [4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-10-11-200059|https://amd64.ocp.releases.ci.openshift.org/releasestream/4.14.0-0.nightly/release/4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-10-11-200059] [aws sdn|https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/aggregated-aws-sdn-upgrade-4.14-micro-release-openshift-release-analysis-aggregator/1712197385490272256]  as well and shows in [azure|https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/aggregated-azure-ovn-upgrade-4.14-micro-release-openshift-release-analysis-aggregator/1712197406507929600]
Status: MODIFIED
#OCPBUGS-57926issue6 days ago"[sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network" fails often on compact CI jobs New
Issue 17081653: "[sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network" fails often on compact CI jobs
Description: This conformance test has been failing regularly in our CI:
 
 4.18 example: [https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.18-e2e-agent-compact-fips/1936031560633421824]
 
 4.17 example: [https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.17-e2e-agent-compact-fips/1934953258862776320]
#OCPBUGS-57523issue12 days agoComponent Readiness: pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network: expected pod UID "aa853924-c6c6-45b7-be56-e059960bc3c6" but got "ab26e0dc-d736-4945-aa02-91fa3f066cdc" from Kube API New
Issue 17069730: Component Readiness: pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network: expected pod UID "aa853924-c6c6-45b7-be56-e059960bc3c6" but got "ab26e0dc-d736-4945-aa02-91fa3f066cdc" from Kube API
Description: (_Feel free to update this bug's summary to be more specific._)
 Component Readiness has found a potential regression in the following test:
 
 {code:none}[sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network{code}
 
 Significant regression detected.
 Fishers Exact probability of a regression: 100.00%.
 Test pass rate dropped from 99.42% to 93.99%.
 
 Sample (being evaluated) Release: 4.19
 Start Time: 2025-06-10T00:00:00Z
 End Time: 2025-06-17T12:00:00Z
 Success Rate: 93.99%
 Successes: 212
 Failures: 14
 Flakes: 7
 
 Base (historical) Release: 4.17
 Start Time: 2024-09-01T00:00:00Z
 End Time: 2024-10-01T00:00:00Z
 Success Rate: 99.42%
 Successes: 803
 Failures: 5
 Flakes: 54
 
 View the [test details report|https://sippy-auth.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/component_readiness/test_details?Architecture=amd64&FeatureSet=default&Installer=ipi&Network=ovn&Platform=azure&Suite=unknown&Topology=ha&Upgrade=minor&baseEndTime=2025-02-25%2023%3A59%3A59&baseRelease=4.18&baseStartTime=2025-01-26%2000%3A00%3A00&capability=Other&columnGroupBy=Architecture%2CNetwork%2CPlatform%2CTopology&component=Networking%20%2F%20cluster-network-operator&confidence=95&dbGroupBy=Platform%2CArchitecture%2CNetwork%2CTopology%2CFeatureSet%2CUpgrade%2CSuite%2CInstaller&environment=Architecture%3Aamd64%20FeatureSet%3Adefault%20Installer%3Aipi%20Network%3Aovn%20Platform%3Aazure%20Suite%3Aunknown%20Topology%3Aha%20Upgrade%3Aminor&flakeAsFailure=false&ignoreDisruption=true&ignoreMissing=false&includeMultiReleaseAnalysis=true&includeVariant=Architecture%3Aamd64&includeVariant=CGroupMode%3Av2&includeVariant=ContainerRuntime%3Acrun&includeVariant=ContainerRuntime%3Arunc&includeVariant=FeatureSet%3Adefault&includeVariant=FeatureSet%3Atechpreview&includeVariant=Installer%3Aipi&includeVariant=Installer%3Aupi&includeVariant=JobTier%3Ablocking&includeVariant=JobTier%3Ainforming&includeVariant=JobTier%3Astandard&includeVariant=LayeredProduct%3Anone&includeVariant=Network%3Aovn&includeVariant=Owner%3Aeng&includeVariant=Owner%3Aservice-delivery&includeVariant=Platform%3Aaws&includeVariant=Platform%3Aazure&includeVariant=Platform%3Agcp&includeVariant=Platform%3Ametal&includeVariant=Platform%3Arosa&includeVariant=Platform%3Avsphere&includeVariant=Topology%3Aha&includeVariant=Topology%3Amicroshift&minFail=3&passRateAllTests=0&passRateNewTests=95&pity=5&sampleEndTime=2025-06-17%2023%3A59%3A59&sampleRelease=4.19&sampleStartTime=2025-06-10%2000%3A00%3A00&testBasisRelease=4.17&testId=openshift-tests-upgrade%3A65e48733eb0b6115134b2b8c6a365f16&testName=%5Bsig-network%5D%20pods%20should%20successfully%20create%20sandboxes%20by%20adding%20pod%20to%20network] for additional context.
 
 Pretty clearly failing worse in the last week than 4.17 and 4.18 both.
Status: New
periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.14-upgrade-from-stable-4.13-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade (all) - 8 runs, 38% failed, 433% of failures match = 163% impact
#1938643905792708608junit3 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
13 failures to create the sandbox
#1938643905792708608junit3 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
13 failures to create the sandbox
#1938200437710655488junit4 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
18 failures to create the sandbox
#1938200437710655488junit4 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
18 failures to create the sandbox
#1938699057413230592junit2 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
12 failures to create the sandbox
#1938699057413230592junit2 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
12 failures to create the sandbox
#1937712857349099520junit5 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
11 failures to create the sandbox
#1937712857349099520junit5 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
11 failures to create the sandbox
#1937562632424787968junit5 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
12 failures to create the sandbox
#1937562632424787968junit5 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
12 failures to create the sandbox
#1937462157918605312junit6 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
18 failures to create the sandbox
#1937462157918605312junit6 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
18 failures to create the sandbox
#1937255561728888832junit6 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
22 failures to create the sandbox
#1937255561728888832junit6 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
22 failures to create the sandbox
#1937198383089324032junit6 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
22 failures to create the sandbox
#1937198383089324032junit6 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
22 failures to create the sandbox
#1937142592487559168junit7 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
16 failures to create the sandbox
#1937142592487559168junit7 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
16 failures to create the sandbox
#1936151191067037696junit9 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
17 failures to create the sandbox
#1936151191067037696junit9 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
17 failures to create the sandbox
#1934828729695997952junit13 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
14 failures to create the sandbox
#1934828729695997952junit13 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
14 failures to create the sandbox
#1934753581412388864junit13 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
15 failures to create the sandbox
#1934753581412388864junit13 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
15 failures to create the sandbox
#1934698441204568064junit13 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
16 failures to create the sandbox
#1934698441204568064junit13 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
16 failures to create the sandbox

Found in 162.50% of runs (433.33% of failures) across 8 total runs and 1 jobs (37.50% failed) in 91ms - clear search | chart view - source code located on github