Job:
#OCPBUGS-20479issue2 weeks agoIgnore pod sandbox creation failures due to networking when the node is NetworkUnavailable=true MODIFIED
Issue 15554882: Ignore pod sandbox creation failures due to networking when the node is NetworkUnavailable=true
Description: The test:
 
 [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
 
 Failed a couple payloads today with 1-2 failures in batches of 10 aggregated jobs. [I looked at the most recent errors|https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/tests/4.15/analysis?test=%5Bsig-network%5D%20pods%20should%20successfully%20create%20sandboxes%20by%20adding%20pod%20to%20network&filters=%7B%22items%22%3A%5B%7B%22columnField%22%3A%22name%22%2C%22operatorValue%22%3A%22equals%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22%5Bsig-network%5D%20pods%20should%20successfully%20create%20sandboxes%20by%20adding%20pod%20to%20network%22%7D%2C%7B%22columnField%22%3A%22variants%22%2C%22not%22%3Atrue%2C%22operatorValue%22%3A%22contains%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22never-stable%22%7D%2C%7B%22columnField%22%3A%22variants%22%2C%22not%22%3Atrue%2C%22operatorValue%22%3A%22contains%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22aggregated%22%7D%5D%2C%22linkOperator%22%3A%22and%22%7D] and they seem to often be the same:
 {code:java}
 1 failures to create the sandbox
 
 ns/openshift-monitoring pod/prometheus-k8s-1 node/ip-10-0-24-217.us-west-1.compute.internal - 475.52 seconds after deletion - reason/FailedCreatePodSandBox Failed to create pod sandbox: rpc error: code = Unknown desc = failed to create pod network sandbox k8s_prometheus-k8s-1_openshift-monitoring_c712fc61-5a1e-4cec-b6fa-18c8f2e91c0a_0(46df8384ffeb433fc0e4864262aa52f2ede570265c43bf8b0900f184b27b10f1): error adding pod openshift-monitoring_prometheus-k8s-1 to CNI network "multus-cni-network": plugin type="multus-shim" name="multus-cni-network" failed (add): CmdAdd (shim): failed to send CNI request: Post "http://dummy/cni": EOF
 {code}
 This [http://dummy/cni] URL looked interesting and seemed worthy of a bug.
 
 The problem is a rare failure overall, but happening quite frequently day to day, search.ci indicates lots of hits over the last two days in both 4.14 and 4.15, and seemingly ovn and sdn both:
 
 [https://search.ci.openshift.org/?search=Post+%22http%3A%2F%2Fdummy%2Fcni%22%3A+EOF&maxAge=48h&context=1&type=bug%2Bissue%2Bjunit&name=&excludeName=&maxMatches=5&maxBytes=20971520&groupBy=job]
 
 Some of these will show as flakes as the test gets retried at times and then passes.
 
 Additionally in 4.14 we are seeing similar failures reporting
 {code:none}
 No CNI configuration file in /etc/kubernetes/cni/net.d/. Has your network provider started?{code}
 [4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-10-12-015817|https://amd64.ocp.releases.ci.openshift.org/releasestream/4.14.0-0.nightly/release/4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-10-12-015817] show pod sandbox errors for [azure|https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/tests/4.14/analysis?filters=%257B%2522items%2522%253A%255B%257B%2522columnField%2522%253A%2522name%2522%252C%2522operatorValue%2522%253A%2522equals%2522%252C%2522value%2522%253A%2522%255Bsig-network%255D%2520pods%2520should%2520successfully%2520create%2520sandboxes%2520by%2520other%2522%257D%252C%257B%2522columnField%2522%253A%2522variants%2522%252C%2522not%2522%253Atrue%252C%2522operatorValue%2522%253A%2522contains%2522%252C%2522value%2522%253A%2522never-stable%2522%257D%252C%257B%2522columnField%2522%253A%2522variants%2522%252C%2522not%2522%253Atrue%252C%2522operatorValue%2522%253A%2522contains%2522%252C%2522value%2522%253A%2522aggregated%2522%257D%252C%257B%2522columnField%2522%253A%2522variants%2522%252C%2522operatorValue%2522%253A%2522contains%2522%252C%2522value%2522%253A%2522azure%2522%257D%255D%252C%2522linkOperator%2522%253A%2522and%2522%257D&test=%5Bsig-network%5D%20pods%20should%20successfully%20create%20sandboxes%20by%20other]  &  [aws|https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/tests/4.14/analysis?filters=%257B%2522items%2522%253A%255B%257B%2522columnField%2522%253A%2522name%2522%252C%2522operatorValue%2522%253A%2522equals%2522%252C%2522value%2522%253A%2522%255Bsig-network%255D%2520pods%2520should%2520successfully%2520create%2520sandboxes%2520by%2520other%2522%257D%252C%257B%2522columnField%2522%253A%2522variants%2522%252C%2522not%2522%253Atrue%252C%2522operatorValue%2522%253A%2522contains%2522%252C%2522value%2522%253A%2522never-stable%2522%257D%252C%257B%2522columnField%2522%253A%2522variants%2522%252C%2522not%2522%253Atrue%252C%2522operatorValue%2522%253A%2522contains%2522%252C%2522value%2522%253A%2522aggregated%2522%257D%252C%257B%2522columnField%2522%253A%2522variants%2522%252C%2522operatorValue%2522%253A%2522contains%2522%252C%2522value%2522%253A%2522aws%2522%257D%255D%252C%2522linkOperator%2522%253A%2522and%2522%257D&test=%5Bsig-network%5D%20pods%20should%20successfully%20create%20sandboxes%20by%20other]  both show a drop from the 10th which comes after our force accept
 
 [4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-10-11-141212|https://amd64.ocp.releases.ci.openshift.org/releasestream/4.14.0-0.nightly/release/4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-10-11-141212]  had a host of failures but it is what killed [aws sdn|https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/aggregated-aws-sdn-upgrade-4.14-micro-release-openshift-release-analysis-aggregator/1712109617682583552]
 
 [4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-10-11-200059|https://amd64.ocp.releases.ci.openshift.org/releasestream/4.14.0-0.nightly/release/4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-10-11-200059] [aws sdn|https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/aggregated-aws-sdn-upgrade-4.14-micro-release-openshift-release-analysis-aggregator/1712197385490272256]  as well and shows in [azure|https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/aggregated-azure-ovn-upgrade-4.14-micro-release-openshift-release-analysis-aggregator/1712197406507929600]
Status: MODIFIED
#OCPBUGS-57926issue7 days ago"[sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network" fails often on compact CI jobs New
Issue 17081653: "[sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network" fails often on compact CI jobs
Description: This conformance test has been failing regularly in our CI:
 
 4.18 example: [https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.18-e2e-agent-compact-fips/1936031560633421824]
 
 4.17 example: [https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.17-e2e-agent-compact-fips/1934953258862776320]
#OCPBUGS-57523issue13 days agoComponent Readiness: pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network: expected pod UID "aa853924-c6c6-45b7-be56-e059960bc3c6" but got "ab26e0dc-d736-4945-aa02-91fa3f066cdc" from Kube API New
Issue 17069730: Component Readiness: pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network: expected pod UID "aa853924-c6c6-45b7-be56-e059960bc3c6" but got "ab26e0dc-d736-4945-aa02-91fa3f066cdc" from Kube API
Description: (_Feel free to update this bug's summary to be more specific._)
 Component Readiness has found a potential regression in the following test:
 
 {code:none}[sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network{code}
 
 Significant regression detected.
 Fishers Exact probability of a regression: 100.00%.
 Test pass rate dropped from 99.42% to 93.99%.
 
 Sample (being evaluated) Release: 4.19
 Start Time: 2025-06-10T00:00:00Z
 End Time: 2025-06-17T12:00:00Z
 Success Rate: 93.99%
 Successes: 212
 Failures: 14
 Flakes: 7
 
 Base (historical) Release: 4.17
 Start Time: 2024-09-01T00:00:00Z
 End Time: 2024-10-01T00:00:00Z
 Success Rate: 99.42%
 Successes: 803
 Failures: 5
 Flakes: 54
 
 View the [test details report|https://sippy-auth.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/component_readiness/test_details?Architecture=amd64&FeatureSet=default&Installer=ipi&Network=ovn&Platform=azure&Suite=unknown&Topology=ha&Upgrade=minor&baseEndTime=2025-02-25%2023%3A59%3A59&baseRelease=4.18&baseStartTime=2025-01-26%2000%3A00%3A00&capability=Other&columnGroupBy=Architecture%2CNetwork%2CPlatform%2CTopology&component=Networking%20%2F%20cluster-network-operator&confidence=95&dbGroupBy=Platform%2CArchitecture%2CNetwork%2CTopology%2CFeatureSet%2CUpgrade%2CSuite%2CInstaller&environment=Architecture%3Aamd64%20FeatureSet%3Adefault%20Installer%3Aipi%20Network%3Aovn%20Platform%3Aazure%20Suite%3Aunknown%20Topology%3Aha%20Upgrade%3Aminor&flakeAsFailure=false&ignoreDisruption=true&ignoreMissing=false&includeMultiReleaseAnalysis=true&includeVariant=Architecture%3Aamd64&includeVariant=CGroupMode%3Av2&includeVariant=ContainerRuntime%3Acrun&includeVariant=ContainerRuntime%3Arunc&includeVariant=FeatureSet%3Adefault&includeVariant=FeatureSet%3Atechpreview&includeVariant=Installer%3Aipi&includeVariant=Installer%3Aupi&includeVariant=JobTier%3Ablocking&includeVariant=JobTier%3Ainforming&includeVariant=JobTier%3Astandard&includeVariant=LayeredProduct%3Anone&includeVariant=Network%3Aovn&includeVariant=Owner%3Aeng&includeVariant=Owner%3Aservice-delivery&includeVariant=Platform%3Aaws&includeVariant=Platform%3Aazure&includeVariant=Platform%3Agcp&includeVariant=Platform%3Ametal&includeVariant=Platform%3Arosa&includeVariant=Platform%3Avsphere&includeVariant=Topology%3Aha&includeVariant=Topology%3Amicroshift&minFail=3&passRateAllTests=0&passRateNewTests=95&pity=5&sampleEndTime=2025-06-17%2023%3A59%3A59&sampleRelease=4.19&sampleStartTime=2025-06-10%2000%3A00%3A00&testBasisRelease=4.17&testId=openshift-tests-upgrade%3A65e48733eb0b6115134b2b8c6a365f16&testName=%5Bsig-network%5D%20pods%20should%20successfully%20create%20sandboxes%20by%20adding%20pod%20to%20network] for additional context.
 
 Pretty clearly failing worse in the last week than 4.17 and 4.18 both.
Status: New
periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.15-upgrade-from-stable-4.14-e2e-azure-sdn-upgrade (all) - 21 runs, 48% failed, 120% of failures match = 57% impact
#1939977983938793472junit13 hours ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
3 failures to create the sandbox
#1938712608857133056junit4 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
2 failures to create the sandbox
#1938042396390461440junit5 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
1 failures to create the sandbox
#1937939227849265152junit6 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
1 failures to create the sandbox
#1937180370319446016junit8 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
1 failures to create the sandbox
#1937340946156883968junit7 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
1 failures to create the sandbox
#1936112760765026304junit11 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
1 failures to create the sandbox
#1936061699186495488junit11 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
2 failures to create the sandbox
#1935858847298097152junit11 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
1 failures to create the sandbox
#1935281101618548736junit13 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
1 failures to create the sandbox
#1935225535684677632junit13 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
2 failures to create the sandbox
#1935172292866740224junit13 days ago
# [sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network
1 failures to create the sandbox

Found in 57.14% of runs (120.00% of failures) across 21 total runs and 1 jobs (47.62% failed) in 120ms - clear search | chart view - source code located on github